Employment Tribunal Fees Regime is Unlawful

by | Employment Law

Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that Employment Tribunal fees regime is unlawful.

If you’re a fair employer and have adequate HR and employment procedures in place, then you will have little to worry about. I’ve read lots of scare blogs and stories over the last few days from Employment Lawyers and HR companies stating the opposite. This is obviously a tactic to generate business but as I’ve said – if you have sound procedures in place then I doubt much will change.

Is this the end for ET fees?

Some commentators said last week probably not, however, today the Employment Tribunal service have taken immediate action to stop charging for Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunals.

Last week’s ruling found the current regime to be unlawful, not the concept of fees entirely. The fees regime could ultimately be replaced with lower fees or by an alternative method of charging which does not act as a barrier to claims being lodged.

With Brexit discussions well underway, this probably isn’t high on the agenda at the moment.

 

Past claims, including repayment of fees

Employment tribunal fees paid in the past should be repaid. The government will announce details of a refund scheme. It also calls into question whether an employment tribunal will allow late submission of a claim (outside the three-month time limit) if the claimant was deterred by the fees from making a claim earlier.

If the tribunal will not allow that, could a claimant sue the government for damages for having brought in unlawful regulations which deterred her from claiming in time?  Lots of questions that remain unanswered for the time being.

 

What should employers be doing?

The Employment Tribunal service now has a lot of work ahead – consideration on rewriting tribunal rules will now need to be implemented with immediate effect. As well as, a reprogramming of the online claim form system.

If you already have good HR procedures in place, then there’s not a lot you need to do.  If you’re a good employer, then you shouldn’t be overly concerned by this ruling.  It does, however, open up the potential for people to make spurious claims, but if you can demonstrate you acted in accordance with your procedures, then there’s not a lot to be concerned about.  If you think your procedures are out of date, now is a good time to review these, but if you have good employment and management in place, not a lot will change.

 

Announcement on Monday 31 July

On Monday 31 July, HM Courts and Tribunals Service issued this statement for the attention of those affected by the decision:

“Dear All

You will all be aware that on 26 July, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor. Unison’s appeal was a challenge to the lawfulness of Employment Tribunals fees. The Court has …found that the fees unlawfully hinder access to justice and the relevant Fees Order – the Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013, has been quashed.

The effect of this judgment is that the fees have been found to be unlawful from the time they were introduced.

We have immediately taken steps to stop charging fees for proceedings in the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal. For an interim period, the digital service has been withdrawn for essential maintenance work to remove references to fees. During this period, anyone seeking to issue an Employment Tribunal claim will need to complete an ET1 form and submit it by post, or in person to the relevant office. Full details on how to do this are available at the following link:https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunals/make-a-claim. We hope to have an online submission portal up and running early next week.

While these arrangements are in place, it may take us a little longer to process claims and deal with enquiries. We would ask for your patience during this period.

Full details of the refund scheme will be announced in due course.”

Holiday Pay Ruling Announced by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)

Holiday Pay Ruling Announced by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)

You will recall our previous communication regarding this case. The long-awaited outcome was confirmed yesterday. This case centred on what calculations should be included in “holiday pay”. The cases started when UK airline employees claimed that their holiday pay...

How a Yes Vote in Scotland’s Referendum Will Impact HR

How a Yes Vote in Scotland’s Referendum Will Impact HR

I was honoured to be approached last week from Washington by the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) to get my thoughts on what a yes vote would mean for HR in Scotland. For those of you that don’t know, the Society for Human Resource Management is the world’s...

Holiday Pay Rule Changes

Holiday Pay Rule Changes

Recent employment tribunal cases have left employers exposed to potential claims for holiday arrears, which could stretch back as far as 1998 when the Working Time Regulations were introduced. The purpose of this information sheet is to share the recent cases and...

HR Consultant for Small Businesses

HR Consultant for Small Businesses

There’s a perception that HR is all about compliance such as discipline and grievance and if you’re a small business or family business, you probably think you don’t need an HR Consultant. You probably think that because your staff don’t cause you any issues and if...

Industrial Action and Your Rights as an Employer

Industrial Action and Your Rights as an Employer

Employers cannot legally dismiss employees if they take place in official industrial action, providing the trade union has carried out the correct notification and balloting procedures. Many disputes between employees and employers can often be resolved before...

How to handle redundancies in the workplace effectively

How to handle redundancies in the workplace effectively

Redundancy conversations need to be dealt with sensitively. There are many successful businesses that at one time or another have to face making some redundancies, whether it's through a temporary downturn in business trade or simply because they have opted for a...